BlueprintOperations & systems
Set the standard for how your AI Agent should sound and act.
A company’s communication style is an essential part of their brand.
In support, that brand voice used to be carried through your human reps; now, in many cases, your AI Agent is the first point of contact. You need to decide how it shows up for them, before you go live.
Like most decisions at this scale, it’s important to get the balance right. Too generic or robotic, and customers will have a poor experience that may impact their confidence in the AI Agent. Overly customized – for example, tailoring it to multiple sub-brands within your business – and you can end up with excessive upkeep.
The instinct is to jump straight to the settings: how formal or long an answer should be, or which words to use. But your decisions sit a level up: the identity, scope, and bar.
Who is this Agent, and how should a customer feel after talking to it? That intent is what cascades into the specific settings your team configures. You likely already have brand-level resources to build from.
Tone of voice guides from your marketing department can be a good place to start, but you’ll likely need to adapt it for your specific customer service context. Some teams might have support style guides, helping to ensure your human team and Agent maintain a consistent standard. It’s also worth consulting your top performing human reps for their input so you codify their best practices.
But remember: identity isn't just phrasing, it's also behavior. How a customer feels is shaped as much by when the Agent asks a question, slows down, or hands off as by the words it chooses. So make sure brand standards are carried forward into other areas like escalation policy.
Should the Agent have one voice, or variations across brands, products, segments, and channels?
A billing dispute reads differently than a simple FAQ, and the register can shift while the underlying voice stays consistent. Vary tone only where it changes the experience, and keep it as simple as the business allows. Variation adds complexity your team must maintain so be diligent with its application.
The more you can simplify it, the better. Focus on where a change in tone, style, or terminology will make a meaningful difference.
Set the standard you're holding the Agent to, and decide up front how your teams will judge whether it’s hitting that bar.
Don’t set a lower bar than you'd accept from a person. You should expect your Agent to perform as well as your best reps, and that’s achievable – after guiding their Agent's tone and behavior, Breathe hit 91% CSAT, matching their human team.
When looking for opportunities to improve, identify content-correct responses that still earn a bad rating or an escalation. That points to opportunities to improve voice and behavior, rather than content. The bar you set will also only hold if someone owns it. Accountability for the standard is yours to assign.
These three decisions will enable your teams to codify your Agent’s identity. In Fin, this customization looks like:
They then hold it to the bar operationally.
Breathe's rules show what that translation looks like in practice. Their Agent replies in a calm, friendly voice that opens with a thank-you, references the customer's question, and closes by offering more help. When a customer seems frustrated it shows empathy and reassurance while sensitive topics like cancellations or pricing route straight to a human.
But having a high level of configurability is important here. As George Dilthey, Head of Support at Clay, put it: "There's a lot of transparency baked into how you configure Fin and build the workflows, which gives us control over the end-to-end experience. That was the light-bulb moment for us. We were letting this loose on our support queue, so we needed that level of transparency and control."
Declan Ivory is VP, Customer Support at Fin. Connect with him on LinkedIn.
Follow Fin for the latest research, guides, and product updates on AI customer service.